Robert,
>> I suggest we do the same as for the 2011 student work:
>> <http://blog.mmiworks.net/2011/07/teaching-interaction-11.html>
>> the work was taken further by my design team in a 3-day design sprint:
>> <http://gui.gimp.org/index.php/Warp_tool_specification>
> The 2010's Voralberg's research is about combining four selection tools
> (fuzzy select, select by color, intelligent scrissors and foreground
> selection).
> The suggestion from Peter Sikking was to do as the 2011 student's have
> done. This research is about iWarp tool. I've read also this research, and
> also studied the work of the design team.
No I suggested that the same procedure is followed, not the same
project content.
That means: if the SoC work goes forward on the combined four selection
tools, my team does a design sprint, taking the design of the combined
four selection tools forward. this would be a solid basis to for you
to work from.
--ps
founder + principal interaction architect
man + machine interface works
http://blog.mmiworks.net: on interaction architecture
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
