gg wrote:
> So now you are completely ignoring what I suggested and going off somewhere
> else.
yes.
because it is not fruitful to have a line-by-line refuting match.
instead, I showed where the real meat of the argument is.
the ‘match’ is played in a completely different ballpark than
where you wanted to kick around a bit with this topic. sorry.
this is the best I could do to keep things constructive here.
--ps
founder + principal interaction architect
man + machine interface works
http://blog.mmiworks.net: on interaction architecture
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
