> > Does this mean Gimp and gegl would be competing for my meagre 4gb of > ram? I didn't know gegl wrote cache files. Where does gegl write its > cache files? >
~/.cache/gegl-0.2/ Yes it will limit you to available ram for the image buffers; but if you're in a circumstance where you would actually need cache for a single image you'll already be in a lot of pain with the current GEGL code. > > When compiling Gimp, would any of the following compile options speed > things up while using Gimp? --without-libexif --without-aa > --without-libxpm --without-libmng --without-wmf --without-webkit > --without-librsvg --without-poppler --without-print --without-gvfs > --without-alsa --without-mac-twain --disable-gtk-doc > --without-script-fu --disable-python --without-dbus > --without-linux-input --without-hal > > And while I'm asking questions, what is the "Linux Input Controller > module"? Does it have anything to do with tablet support (I use a > tablet)? > > Sorry to be asking so many questions! I've been using Gimp a lot in > the last couple of weeks and liking it more and more and more, except > for the speed of execution. So I'm trying to figure out what the > options are for improving performance. > Nothing you can do at configure time is going to give you a meaningful performance improvement.
_______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
