Agreeded - the size sliders in GIMP are a problem - I've implemented the logarithmic slider back in the time - and it was ovecome by the new linear sliders. I still don't see how the lienar sliders make sense - when painting detail one endś up using the left 5% of the slider to count values. (The new widget also takes more well positioned clicks to allow one to type in a new value - on the up-to-2.6 widget, one could click, swipe over the text entry box - that would select the value there, and just type in a new value - the way the new one misbehaves is subtle, but far harder to use )
Can we rethink those sliders for gimp 2.10 ? Not trying to add new features/fixes like I tried in the final days before 2.8 (make the "click on botton half to slide the value" behavior to be sensible to mouse speed), - but check how is the actual usage, and put in place something less clumsy instead? (And have in mind you are talking about a value one sets ina dialog, but the same disfunctional widgets are used when painting) On 3 December 2013 15:34, Elle Stone <ellest...@ninedegreesbelow.com> wrote: > For a sample camera-generated jpeg, in Gimp 2.8, Radius 50.0, Amount 0.15, > Threshold 0 does a nice job. Experimenting, the Gimp 2.9 USM settings that > produce a similar result are Std. Dev. 4.00, Scale 0.20. These are very > small values on a very large slider range. _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
