>
> I'm just arguing against adding checkboxes arbitrarily just in case the
> user wants to do anything. That's bad UI design.
> I'm trying to discuss the costs and benefits of adding that complexity.
> Isn't this achievable with different tools and methods? Is it needed so
> frequently that is reasonable to add an extra checkbox to every single
> operation?
> Nobody answers that.
>
>
I'd say "no", personally. But then again, I think there are lots of ways to
handle this without cluttering the UI further.
I think everyone can have what they want, but we need to think over the UI
proposal a bit more.
As the proposal stands, I'd have to agree with Gez and others to say that
it's just too much extra.
I want what Elle wants, though, in terms of functionality and I think we
could brainstorm a cleaner/better solution while the devs finish with 2.9

Thoughts?


>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> List address:    gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
> List membership:
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
> List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
>
_______________________________________________
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address:    gimp-developer-list@gnome.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives:   https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list

Reply via email to