> Is this what you mean by "original layer"? If a layer stack has two
> layers, A and B, with B as the upper layer, and if a transform/rotate/etc
> tool is used on B, the "original layer" is layer B *before* the tranform,
> and the transformed layer is what B would look like if the transform were
> made using the current settings.
Yes, Elle, I think you got it. :)
If I understand what you mean by "original layer", I don't need to see the
> original layer B. What I really do need to see is layer A, meaning I'd like
> the option to set the opacity of the transformed layer B to 50% so I can
> compare the transformed layer B to layer A.
> Unfortunately right now lowering the opacity of layer B on which the
> transform is being done doesn't seem to allow to see layer A through the
> *transformed* layer B.
You can currently kinda get around this by setting the "Image opacity" in
the Tool options palate for unified transform tool to less than 100%.
Unfortunately, unless you also change the "Opacity" field in the layer
palate, the untransformed layer B is still in the way.
Thus my proposal:
hide/remove the untransformed version of layer B while the user is
transforming it, and set the default "Image opacity" for the transform tool
to 50% by default.
This would get layer B out of the way, and let you see translucently a bit
of what is under the transformation preview as well (layer A).
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> List address: email@example.com
> List membership:
> List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: firstname.lastname@example.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list