Small phrase-change recommendation:
I dislike this like in the FAQ:
"Why can’t you just copy Adobe Photoshop to make GIMP usable?"
Reason: GIMP is not the least bit unusable, and this question makes it
sound like the general consensus is it's garbageware. ;P
Why can’t you just copy Adobe Photoshop to make GIMP more "user friendly"?
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Pat David <patda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:24 AM Alexandre Prokoudine <
> alexandre.prokoud...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > > Like it or not - GIMP is an alternative program to (and in much the
> > niche
> > > as) Adobe Photoshop. We should be aiming to make people use GIMP (or a
> > different
> > > open-source program) instead of or at least in addition to Photoshop.
> > let's
> > > stop beating around the bush and admit it.
> > FAQ specifically covers this. Please read it.
> > Alex
> > _______________________________________________
> > gimp-developer-list mailing list
> > List address: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > List membership:
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
> > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
> Pat David
> gimp-developer-list mailing list
> List address: email@example.com
> List membership:
> List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
gimp-developer-list mailing list
List address: firstname.lastname@example.org
List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list
List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list