Hi Simon, the better way - in my opinion - should be the best technical solution (let's call it Scheme) BUT with the best user experience (let's call it 'script builder'?). A normal user cannot start and study Scheme (or Python) in order to have a script... should need a script builder/recorder.
Thanks, Maurizio Il giorno mer 22 lug 2020 alle ore 16:37 Simon Budig <si...@budig.de> ha scritto: > Hi Massimo. > > Massimo Fidanza via gimp-developer-list (gimp-developer-list@gnome.org) > wrote: > > in the source archive there are 51 .scm scripts and 11 .py Scheme scripts > > has a complex syntax and I do not know how much it is used today. What > are > > the advantages of Scheme compared to Python? Would it make sense to > rewrite > > plugins that still use Scheme in Python and remove the Scheme language? > > The main advantage of scheme is, that we can easily ship the interpreter > within gimp. With python we'll always depend on an external python > installation. > > Yeah, scheme sometimes can be a bit optuse, but in my eyes having an > interpreter within the gimp distribution is a strong point to consider. > > Bye, > Simon > > -- > si...@budig.de http://simon.budig.de/ > _______________________________________________ > gimp-developer-list mailing list > List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org > List membership: > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list > List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list > _______________________________________________ gimp-developer-list mailing list List address: gimp-developer-list@gnome.org List membership: https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer-list List archives: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gimp-developer-list
