Ralf Engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bug nr. (choose a number) Bucket fill behaves strange with existing selection
> Bucket fill behaves different when a selection is active.
what do you mean by "behaves strange" ? The Bucket Fill behaviour is intended
and I don't see why you categorize it as a bug. If no selection is active,
the tool tries to follow the metaphore of filling color into the picture
that flows until it is stopped by some picture detail. I think this is the
common way how Bucket Fill tools behave. It behaves differently if a selection
is active since when a selection is made, the user will expect that the
entire selection gets filled. I must admit that this is not obvious.
> An other point is, that you can make the same thing setting the threshold to
> -fill with foreground/background color is usefull but does not really
> integrate with the tools.
does it have to? And if so, how do you propose it should?
> -bucket fill behaves not intuitive (and works to slow with threshold set to
yes we could optimize the threshold=255 case but I doubt it's worth the
> -too many tools for filling
a lot of people already find it difficult that there's no tool for Pattern
filling but I'm open for suggestions.
Gimp-developer mailing list