On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 10:34:19PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > and Gtk is proven to be hard to port to that environment.
> ... but I still fear that porting gimp-perl might be quite a task.

Why? I apart from trivial changes (gimp-perl has to parse the output of
gimptool -n --install-admin-bin because gimptool doesn't have an option
to output the pluginpath and can't be edited under windows), it compiled
out of the box five minutes ago under windows 2000 using cygwin and the
binaries from www.gimp.org/win32 (which, as I read it, are not really
compatible with my environment anyways).

I think the remaining problems are highly trivial (e.g. possible reliance
on / instead of \, which mostly isn't a problem under windows anyways,
socket functions etc.)

It's just that this has to do somebody who knows windows better then me (I
lack the time & compiler to compile gimp &c for windows just to test it).

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       [EMAIL PROTECTED]      |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Reply via email to