On 07/20/03 06:49, Sven Neumann wrote:

> A few people expressed that they dislike the version number, other
> liked it. We went through all the arguments a few times and finally
> decided that we want to go for 2.0.


Firstly, I have no control over the version number and there's no point
arguing with a wall - I simply did this for my own sanity.  I went
through the list archives, and have tallied what people publicly
'decided' should be the next version.  Here is the list:

[1] david gowers        [implicit]              1.4
[2] Marc A. Lehmann     [start of subject]      1.4
[3,4] RaphaŽl Quinet                            1.4
[5] Guillermo S. Romero                         1.6 or 1.8
[6] Michael J. Hammel                           1.4
-
[7] Tino Schwarze                               1.4
[8] Sven Neumann                                2.0
[9] Branko Collin                               1.6 or 1.8
[10] Christopher W. Curtis                      1.5
[11] Shlomi Fish                                1.4
-
[12] Robert L Krawitz                           not-2.0
[13] Owen               [sqrt(2)]               1.4[142...]
[14] Patrick McFarlan                           not-2.0
[15] David Neary                                2.0
[16] Henrik Brix Andersen                       2.0
-
[17] Adam D. Moss                               8.0
[18] Steinar H. Gunderson                       1.4
[19] Nathan Carl Summers                        1.4
[20] Jakub Steiner                              1.4
[21] Daniel Egger                               1.4
-
[22] Marco Wessel                               XP
[23] Joao S. O. Bueno                           1.4
[24] wolfgang                                   1.4
[24] Carol Spears                               1.4

Since this isn't a vote, I'm not tallying any numbers, and there may be
20,000 people all saying they want 2.0 in the July archives; however,
these are not yet online so I can't scan them.

Chris

References:
[1]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008711.html
[2]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008713.html
[3]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008800.html
[4]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008769.html
[5]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008715.html
[6]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008716.html
[7]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008719.html
[8]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008728.html
[9]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008745.html
[10]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008806.html
[11]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008808.html
[12]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008749.html
[13]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008737.html
[14]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008750.html
[15]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008759.html
[16]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008827.html
[17]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008828.html
[18]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008760.html
[19]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008761.html
[20]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008762.html
[21]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008832.html
[22]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008768.html
[23]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008776.html
[24]http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/lists/gimp-developer/2003-June/008785.html

_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Reply via email to