Manish Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:58:39AM -0800, Nathan Carl Summers wrote:
>> On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Manish Singh wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
>> > > What requirements would the new PDB have?
>> >
>> > There's a number of issues to be addressed, like GEGL node support,
>> > efficiency, UI generation, distributed processing, and macro recording
>> > support.
>> Macro recording is already trivial with libpdb: you just connect to the
>> appropriate signal of the Pdb object.
> Have you given any thought on how to macroize interactive paint
> functions?

By simply passing an array of GimpCoords to the yet-to-be-generated
core PDB wrappers, just as all core functions will have to be invoked
via these wrappers to make marco recording possible.

Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to