On Mon, 7 Jun 2004, GSR - FR wrote:
> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 15:10:30 +0200
> From: GSR - FR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Gimp-user] Re: Blur plug-in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-06-07 at 1149.52 +0200):
> > The plan is to remove the randomize and repeat functionality. That
> > would allow us to also remove the (quite confusing) dialog.
> > Filters->Blur->Blur would then be a simple blur with a 3x3 convolution
> > kernel. It would be fast and easy to use but of course we it would be
> > less powerful. So the question is, is anyone actually using this
> > functionality? Are there scripts out there that rely on
> > plug-in-blur-randomize to be available?
> Why not just ditch it completly then? If it just a 3x3 convolution
> that you have to manually repeat, and there are already other filters
> and scripts that do the same. The point of repeat is not having to
> rerun manually to get a "bigger radius" blur.
If there was a more convenient way to save a 3x3 convolution matrix than
having to write a script-fu script around the convulotion matrix plugin
then there would not be any reason to keep the blur plugin but at the
moment manually typing in a convulation matrix gets really annoying really
Gimp-developer mailing list