Robert L Krawitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Right. The problem is how the application determines whether a
> particular parameter is a measurement or just an arbitrary floating
> point number. The only piece of framework that Gimp-Print's going to
> have is a new parameter type that's a "unit" rather than a
> dimensionless floating point or integer number. How the application
> deals with that is up to it. Basically it sounds like we're in
> reasonable agreement here.
Yes, sounds like it. Perhaps it would be easier to speak in terms of
> That's an issue for the plugin to deal with. Gimp-Print deals
> entirely in points (1/72"), and it's up to the application to
> translate that into units useful for people.
That's fine. As long as there's a clearly specified value, we can deal
Gimp-developer mailing list