ōyvind KolŚs wrote:
might be similar to what you want (note that I have run it on the jpeg version of your original.) running with a radius of 1.
I was careless and did not realize the jpeg will make such a big difference. I replaced the original on my page with a png file, which you can grab if you wish and see the problem for real.
While your settings are definitely better, personally I find the result not good enough. And as I mentioned, the speed of the plugin is a big deterrent as well.
-Joseph _______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer