ōyvind KolŚs wrote:


might be similar to what you want (note that I have run it on the jpeg
version of
your original.) running with a radius of 1.


I was careless and did not realize the jpeg will make such a big difference. I replaced the original on my page with a png file, which you can grab if you wish and see the problem for real.

While your settings are definitely better, personally I find the result not good enough. And as I mentioned, the speed of the plugin is a big deterrent as well.

Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to