[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2004-12-03 at 1012.37 +1300):
> BTW, all this was part of a small evaluation of CCD noise removal method. If
> are interested, the details are in
> The results are quite dismaying. I appreciate any insight on the subject.
> However please note I am not looking for a solution for the specific image I
> used, but a generic one.
I am having a deja vu... http://cimg.sf.net/ Wait, the other time was
about fixing dust from scans. :]
Gimp-developer mailing list