On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:41:30PM +0100, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Of course you can't load a local file into a gimp instance running on
This is, of course, possible, but not with the current gimp-remote, and
it's probably not that desirable t make it run.
> a different machine but on the same X server. That's not any different
> to the current situation though.
It's very different, the current situation "just works" when invoking gimp.
With your proposed change it simply doesn't work.
That *is* a big difference in my book.
> And it would probably be possible to design the remote protocol in a way
> that avoids this problem. So we can only improve things.
I don't thin it is in general. It's possible t ake it work in, say, most
circumstances, but I don't think the current behaviouor is so annoying as
to make failures acceptable.
--
The choice of a
-----==- _GNU_
----==-- _ generation Marc Lehmann
---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / http://schmorp.de/
-=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xcf.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
