On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 17:24:01, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> This is intentional - google for "reply to considered harmful".
This might have been of concern years ago, before people were used to
mailing lists which do set the Reply-to header. Nowadays, I'd say that the
opposite is true, since setting the Reply-to header seems common practice
(at least if I look at the mailing lists I'm following, there are only 2
that don't set the header).
< Jernej Simoncic ><><><><>< http://deepthought.ena.si/ >
It's on the other side.
-- Preudhomme's Law of Window Cleaning
Gimp-developer mailing list