On Tue, 31 May 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 18:48:58 +0200
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Gimp server startup [OT]
> On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 17:24:01, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> > This is intentional - google for "reply to considered harmful".
> This might have been of concern years ago, before people were used to
> mailing lists which do set the Reply-to header. Nowadays, I'd say that the
> opposite is true, since setting the Reply-to header seems common practice
> (at least if I look at the mailing lists I'm following, there are only 2
> that don't set the header).
The problem is still the same.
It is better to accidentally mail only one person and need to resend to
the list than it is to accidentally send mail to many people.
Gimp-developer mailing list