> Von: "Alastair M. Robinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ciaran O'Riordan wrote:
> > The lack of Pantone support in GIMP is a useful example of how software
> > users are harmed by software patents, but to make this claim I need to
> > be able to point out which patents cause this problem.
> Is that really a patent issue? Pantone support need be nothing more
> complicated than a name -> colour lookup table. (That's how InDesign
> implements it - an EPS file defining a shedload of CMYKCustomColors).
> I would have thought that the issue with Pantone colours would be
> Trademark and/or Copyright.
Pantone owns the copyright of the "Pantone*" terms and the color names.
Googling for "pantone copyright" truns up at least one case where this was
used to get a pantone palette off the web.
> > If no-one minds, I'll submit the information here too:
> > http://www.gnu.org/patent-examp/patent-examples.html#GIMP
Does anyone update this site? Right now, it reads like the LZW patent is
still being claimed. I thought this went away last year?
> Publishing any examples you may find could, unfortunately, backfire for
> the same reason.
Especially if the page is not kept up-to-date - we don't need another source
to spread FUD, the holders of trivial patents can dothis on their own.
Lust, ein paar Euro nebenbei zu verdienen? Ohne Kosten, ohne Risiko!
Satte Provisionen für GMX Partner: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/partner
Gimp-developer mailing list