On 11/19/05, Dag Rune Sneeggen wrote:
> John Leach wrote:
> > Looking at the original, I can see what it's accentuating but it looks
> > bad. Other photos look great, much sharper compared with the cubic
> > algorithm. This seems rather too sharp, in the wrong place.
> But still, its clearly a faulty algorithm... Quite serious as well(?)
Am I the only one who sees the lanczos produced image, as a near
perfect resize of the original? On the other hand, cubic interpolation
has clearly lost the details that you seem to not want but clearly are
on the original.
Gimp-developer mailing list