> I guessed from what Sven said, inverting the image colors first might
help, and I was right.
> I made my second try by:
> * Inverting the image
> * Selecting the entire image in the initial 'lasso' pass.
> * Disabling 'Contiguous'
> * Setting L,a,b sensitivity to 0,707,555 respectively. (a,b was just a
guess, but L was 0 to accommodate the harsh brightness contrasts of the
> * Switching to background mode
> * Scrawling a bit (~3 strokes) on the windows
> Overall it was quite straightforward, actually.
> (selected areas marked in blueness -- the window 'shadow' got selected,
but otherwise it seems quite satisfactory.)
.. My experience above causes me to wonder if 'BGselect' could be made by
inverting the L*a*b values before interpreting them; maybe something to try
I do not quite understand your problems. I am an aloof developer who
has serious problems to understand user's problems. Please help me
out, maybe I am misunderstanding something? So please do not get me
What one defines foreground or background is not a matter of the tool
but a matter of the human being who is using the tool.
I cut out the windows selecting them all with the lasso.
Then I disabled contiguos because the Windows in this image are not
connected (may be "disconnected" would be a better string?).
Then I needed a few foreground strokes, mainly to select the KDE
toolbar (or was it GNOME) and to include all the colors shown in this
GIMP tool dialog.
The result is then: http://www.gerald-friedland.de/tmp/multiwindow_cutout.png
If you want to have the screen-background instead of the windows, use
"select/invert" and you get the background instead of the
No need to fiddle with color sensitivity....?
Gerald Friedland Raum 164 Tel: ++49 (0)30/838-75134
Freie Universität Berlin Takustr. 9 http://www.gerald-friedland.org
Institut für Informatik 14195 Berlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gimp-developer mailing list