On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 09:59:38PM +0200, Neil Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 10:48:27AM -0700, Carol Spears wrote:
> > others have mentioned that this list is a good way to talk to the people
> > who might be able to and interested in sharing a booth with gnome.
> > the process that one must go through to "qualify" is somewhat important,
> > even if i or anyone else doesn't like those answers.
> > i also did not mention any filthy rumors. i was talking about what a
> > friend told me about when she managed the GNOME booth here. what
> > possibly could be filthy about that?
> As a gimp user of many years who has watched (put up with and hated) your
> periodic immature bursts of vitriol, I have come up with a few alternative
> explanations for your behavior (and possible work-arounds) -
> 1 - you're a paranoid schizoprenic (work-around - please make sure you've
> been taking your medicine for at least 10 days before you post to the
> list, or, better, take Sven's advice and "Please unsubscribe yourself
> from all GIMP mailing-lists and leave us alone.")
> 2 - you're a lush (work around - please make sure you've been sober for
> at least 10 days before you post to the list, or, better, take Sven's
> advice and "Please unsubscribe yourself from all GIMP mailing-lists
> and leave us alone.")
> 3 - You're an unpleasant person with no life who gets pleasure from insulting
> and demeaning people who (unlike you) are trying to get things done
> (work-around - get a life and take Sven's advice and "Please
> yourself from all GIMP mailing-lists and leave us alone.")
> Personally, I think it's (3) and I have no idea why you're still permitted
> to post with a "gimp.org" address and to have the "carol.gimp.org" DNS entry.
it is this:
4 - Not about any person, not personal.
these questions i ask have nothing to do with me personally.
i actually agree with some or all of the three things you did list, but
none of them have anything to do with the questions i am asking.
also, i was asking a question about the one person i know who was asked
to be in attendence at one of these boothe events. i was asking about a
nice volunteer. should i read between the lines that the volunteer
process is actually filthy and disgusting or can i get an honest answer?
i am sorry that i don't know or care about you enough to have one of the
three opinions you took the time to make of me.
> Just go away.
> Cheers! (Relax...have a homebrew) [in the light of the above - that's probably
> not a good
> THEOREM: VI is perfect.
> PROOF: VI in roman numerals is 6. The natural numbers < 6 which divide 6 are
> 1, 2, and 3. 1+2+3 = 6. So 6 is a perfect number. Therefore, VI is perfect.
> -- Arthur Tateishi
> Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer mailing list