On Thu, 2007-06-21 at 09:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Indeed it may be best if this only gets shown when relevant. If there are  
> no indexed layers present (which will often be the case) it is irrelevant  
> and just slows the user by feeding him unneeded info to parse.

It is very unlikely that an indexed image doesn't contain any layers.
Why do you claim that this will often be the case? Do I miss
sometig obvious here?

I also don't follow your other suggestions:

> c/affect channels and masks only/only affect separate colour channels
> and transparency masks/

We should probably change it to say "layer masks" since that's what we
use throughout the user interface. But we never call them transparency
masks and the term "color channel" is quite misleading. What's meant
here is a saved selection and we call that a Channel.


Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to