On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:35:30 +0200, Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 08:17 -0400, Robert L Krawitz wrote:
>> Note that GIMP is not the only application that does this;
> Why should any application do what you suggest? If you open a JPEG file
> and save it again as JPEG, then the original quality factor is
> completely irrelevant. You are doing a lossy operation, there is no way
> to save the file with the same quality again.
It would seem reasonable to assume that if the user has selected a
size/quality trade-off given by a specific value, say, quality=98 he does
not want to have to explicitly remake that decision every time he touches
Also this info I part of the header and part of specification of that file
so arbitarily changing it would seem to me to be a spec violation.
Does your reply indicate you take a "this feature not a bug" approach here
and you think is the best way gimp should deal with this situation?
Gimp-developer mailing list