Rather strange conclusion from my POV - if something very convenient
cannot be provided for each and every case, it shouldn't be provided at
I can prove my opinion with a case with healing brush. It saves me a lot
of time and efforts during photo retouching despite the fact it doesn't
support healing along a path.
Raphaël Quinet wrote:
> This should definitely change for 2.6. But my question was about
> what kind of workaround can be implemented quickly for 2.4. It looks
> like it might be better to have all plug-ins broken in the same way
> instead of just fixing the most used ones, so that would be the
> second option that I described in my previous message: ignore the
> settings from the original JPEG images and always re-use the
> parameters from the last saved image. This is bad, but at least this
> is consistent with other file plug-ins (until they can all be fixed).
Gimp-developer mailing list