On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 16:03 +0000, Omari Stephens wrote:
> It seems counterproductive that Rafael Mesquita received three separate
> responses that started off pretty identically (even though they included
> and useful information). I'd like to offer the suggestion that, when
> to a project proposal sent to the ML, that the responder (1) acknowledge
> responses sent before his own, (2) try to avoid duplicating content of the
> responses, and (3) explicitly mention how his response differs from the ones
> before it.
This is unavoidable on a mailing-list. Not everyone receives the mails
at the same time and there is no way you can know if anyone else has
already responded to the mail.
Gimp-developer mailing list