Am Mittwoch, 22. Oktober 2008 16:20:20 schrieb Karine Delvare: > Monica Kraenzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > > It really sounds funny that you are releasing software and manuals to > > the public with GNU licenses to freely distribute them privately and > > commercially but at the end you don't want people to use the license > > but to ask you before.
The right to use and the right to publish does not free a publisher from the responsibility of ensuring a quality end-product. From what I have read here, this responsibility has be entirely neglected in this case. > It doesn't look like you understand the difference between "legally > possible" and "good idea". It's too bad you printed a book of bad > quality just because you didn't contact the documentation team first. > It could have been great to prepare a top-quality version of the manual > with the team and release it as a book. > > It's exactly the same when people take GIMP source code, brand it > "MyPhotoshop" or whatever, and sell it. Then buyers complain that there Not quite exactly the same, as the title of such a piece of software would be different. But in the current case, the title is "Gimp User's Manual", i.e. it is directly related to the Gimp project and the finger will point at all members of the developing team and any contributors if there are bugs. This is the main point why people here are so upset for not being asked before publishing the book in the first place. The people here do want to produce quality software and quality documentation as well. Any editor of a published book that is compiled from articles of different authors (this is what also applies to the GUM) should read through those articles carefully and clear out any questions that might arise from the differences between the article (i.e. the documentation in this case) and the topic (i.e. the actual product in the current stable version) before the final work is going to be published. This is even more true with the Gimp, where the stable product and the documentation are not kept in sync (since keeping them in sync would slow down the software development). just my 2cc Torsten
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer
