On Tue, 2009-07-14 at 22:54 +0200, Martin Nordholts wrote:
> > That's fine, but it doesn't deal with the problem of how the file
> > plug-in deals with the actual export. So far the gimp_export_image()
> > functions does take care of all the nasty details. We definitely don't
> > want to duplicate that code all over the place.
> The plan is to let plug-ins still use gimp_export_image() for creating
> an image suitable for exporting, it's just that we will remove that
> function's bad habit of asking annoying questions in the process. This
> is slight change in API semantics, but the ABI/API is still unchanged
> and I don't consider this a problem.
That will break all file plug-ins that use gimp_export_image(). I am
sorry, but that is totally not an option.
Gimp-developer mailing list