On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 03:53 +0000, Alchemie foto\grafiche wrote:
> 1) i agree with Alexia , get rid of all duplicates as the "circle soft" and
> "circle hard" brush.
> If may be scaled only 1 is needed
Yes. For script compatibility, either ship them, or have the
brush-choosing code automatically interpolate, if a script
asks for "footprint-36" and we have only "footprint" or maybe
> 2) most flexible brushes are that created with the brush editor that can be
> not only resized but
> tilted, rotated,made harder or softer on the fly, even with keystrokes
Maybe there's a need for a structured brush name format?
"footprint/titled 15-size 96.2/colours bg fg/spacing 150%/"
> But shapes are so limited : will be no possible add some simple shapes as
> spiral and ring ?
Yes, with SVG brushes (I hope).
> 3 about animated brush, stars, grass,stones and dirty brushes may be a good
> their possible use should be intuitive
Careful! "intuitive" is a word people use to mean,
"based on my experience, I could predict how to use it"
but people have very varied backgrounds.
We should leave "intuitive" for the Earl Peter Sikking,
Duke of the Vision.
> As default for clone tool i see a HARD circle brush at 100% opacity,
That's the default brush for everything I think.
PhotoShop displays a brush chooser with a slider for scale, iirc, and
you can even put it on the toolbar, as you can with paintshop pro and
Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C, http://www.w3.org/People/Quin/
Pictures from old books: http://fromoldbooks.org/
Ankh: irc.sorcery.net irc.gnome.org www.advogato.org
Gimp-developer mailing list