On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:35 PM, vabijou2 <vabi...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Lame, crippled, inept, deficient, or sexual deviant .....
> I get that it's an acronym, but that doesn't mean it isn't incredibly
> strange to want to associate a project that the developers are proud of with
> any of these interpretations!

You are restarting an argument that is already a decade old, and has
been fought to conclusion a dozen times over.  If you REALLY think it
needs to be revisited, read all of the old posts and come up with a
new point to make, or at least address the reasoning given repeatedly
for not changing.
Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to