On Saturday 31 October 2009, vabijou2 wrote:
> Speaking again as a non-programmer, why would anything have to change
> internally?

Many internal names have "gimp" in them, and future generations of programmers 
should not have to ask themselves what that stands for when nobody 
knows "GIMP" anymore.

So while changing names internally is not strictly required, it would be very 
very much recommended.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to