On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 11:17 AM, James Cox <jay...@gimp.org> wrote:
>> Christopher Howard wrote:
> Thinking about this some more, the error diffusion is probably not even
> necessary.  You should be able to get by with some random dithering like
> the following (if it wasn't slower than molasses):
>  result = floor(input * opacity + g_random_double());

If you pregenerate a lookup table (say 256 entries), keep a counter
which cycles 0,1,2,....255,0,1,2,....255, and only add a random
integer to that counter at the start of every dab, you could get that
going at decent speeds.
Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to