Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 22:38 +0100, yahvuu wrote:
> [...]
>> II. Range of actually useful values for IJG quality value
>>     For GIMP's target users less than half of all possible settings
>> are useful:
> possibly - I've often used values as low as 35% or sometimes lower.
> "The sweet spot" depends hugely on your image and your purpose -
> consider providing a "lowsrc" alternate image for low bandwidth
> Web users for example, or a thumnail.

good point -- that proves wrong my claim that there were only a handful of
useful quality settings. Also, further discussion about those 5 values >95
becomes moot, i guess..

Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to