Thanks Matin's feedback. :)
Another question: could developing a stand alone but gegl-based application
be a GSoC project?
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Martin Nordholts <ense...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 03/27/2010 12:26 PM, Jenny wrote:
> > GEGL shipped an GUI application for test, with which user takes many OPs
> > on the default image. But this application can not load images.
> > I want to write a user-friendly GUI for GEGL as my GSoC project. I think
> > this application should provide many drag-able "block"s, where each
> > block assigns an operation. User drags blocks and connects them to
> > process image. Kinda like the simulink
> > (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulink).
> > Expecting feedback.
> IMHO, GEGL should only be a great image processing library, not an image
> processing library + an advanced UI tool. Also being the latter adds
> considerable maintenance and development burdens, making it harder to
> focus on the core functionality. It'd be fine to create an external
> project that has a GEGL dependency though, of course.
> / Martin
> My GIMP Blog:
> "GIMP 2.8 development still under control"
> Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer mailing list