@Martin It seams to be much more difficult, don't you think?
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Martin Nordholts <ense...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 05/06/2010 04:24 PM, Thales img wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I have an idea and I'd like to know what you think about it. > > > > Let's suppose a situation: > > > > We make a 100 x 100px rectangle selection on a 2000 x 2000px, and we > > want to create a new layer to paint the rectangle, so when we ask a for > > a new layer a popup is opened asking Name, Width, Height, etc, for the > > new layer, for default the Width and Height values are 2000px² (our > > document's size), we click "Ok" and we have a new layer. > > > > My point here it is that we have a 2000px² layer for a 100px² object, > > and as I can see - as a user - a 2000px² consumes more performance(I > > don't know if it's Memory or CPU) than a 100px². > > > > So my idea is to have a option when creating a new layer; maybe a > > checkbox with something like: > > > > [__] Follow Selection's Size > > That is a step in the wrong direction, the right thing to do is to make > layer boundaries automatically managed so a user won't be bothered with > the New Layer dialog at all. > > / Martin > > > > -- > > My GIMP Blog: > http://www.chromecode.com/ > "GIMP 2.8 development still under control" > _______________________________________________ > Gimp-developer mailing list > Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU > https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer > -- Thales Oliveira - Img Brasil +55 31 (8365 3869 - 3309 8760)
_______________________________________________ Gimp-developer mailing list Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer