On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:37 AM, Charlie De <charlieco...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Compile & and end-user. Not all en-users compile their version of Gimp.
>> Bumping the version number in XCF and implementing the compatibility would
>>probably be better.
> Of course. But I had the impression the development cost of such a solution
> the need to keep XCF unchanged were major considerations. A compile option
> would avoid both issues. It is true that not all end users will compile, but
> least those who need the fix are offered a way of obtaining it.
What you are saying is that we should maintain a fork for you... I
doubt thats going to happen. You can easily maintain your own patch
set yourself however. Its been done before. Not a complete fork but a
patch set distributed separately. GIMP Painter was such a patch set.
So far some of it has been integrated to mainstream, some of it is
Gimp-developer mailing list