That certainly looks like something I could help with. Is there a priority
list of missing operations, or is it more a case of just going through the
gimp filters one by one? Is it the final intention that all gimp filters
will be implemented by gegl one day?

Andy.

On 11 January 2011 17:13, Øyvind Kolås <pip...@gimp.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 4:19 PM, andy gill <andygg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hello, I'm a coder with some spare time, wondering how to spend it.
> > Are there any jobs that could be usefully picked up by someone who isn't
> one
> > of the core developers?
>
> One thing that will prove beneficial in the future, is the porting
> more of the plug-ins GIMP ships with by default to also be available
> GEGL ops. (thus preparing for the time when GIMP is internally using
> GeglBuffers and having >8bpc ways of processing is more important.
>
> Looking at various files in common/ and other subdirectories of
> http://git.gnome.org/browse/gegl/tree/operations/ should provide a
> guide to how such ops can be implemented.
>
> Such contributions would be completely self-contained and thus not
> need any changes to infrastructure.
>
> Such ops would at first only be available through the GEGL tool with
> automatically constructed property UIs. I expect at some point that
> there will also be seperatly loadable plug-ins providing custom UIs
> for specific GEGL ops. (This is something I believe might belong in
> GIMP not GEGL; or perhaps even in a gegl-gtk-ui convenience library).
>
> /Øyvind K.
> --
> http://pippin.gimp.org/
>
_______________________________________________
Gimp-developer mailing list
Gimp-developer@lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU
https://lists.XCF.Berkeley.EDU/mailman/listinfo/gimp-developer

Reply via email to