On 03/15/2011 10:44 AM, Jon Nordby wrote:
> On 15 March 2011 07:43, Martin Nordholts<ense...@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Not including API to work with layer groups in Python is not a
>> regression, it's just missing functionality in one of the scripting
>> languages. It is unfortunate if GIMP 2.8 will be released without layer
>> groups support in Python, but the alternative is worse: not releasing
>> GIMP 2.8 at all. And we should arrange for the Python bindings to be
>> automatically generated from the PDB rather than wasting man-weeks on
>> manually keeping it up to date. Not an easy task perhaps, but the only
>> sensible one.
> Long term, bindings should of course be generated (or rather be
> dynamic using pygobject, when/if possible).
> However I need layer groups exposed for the Python API in order to
> support layer groups in OpenRaster, so I will probably do these
> bindings for 2.8. Just need to find the time. Do we have a bug open
> about this issue?

Take a look at

Bug 624303 - Introduce an item class in PyGIMP

  / Martin


My GIMP Blog:
"Why GIMP 2.8 is not released yet"
Gimp-developer mailing list

Reply via email to