I'm afraid I don't have a better answer than "pippin told me this".
If nobody object in the next few days, I will unmark them for translation.
2011/8/2 Martin Nordholts <ense...@gmail.com>
> 2011/8/2 Michael Muré <batolet...@gmail.com>:
> >> #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagecoefcalc.c:82
> >> #: ../app/gegl/gimpoperationcagetransform.c:118
> >> msgid "A GimpCageConfig object, that define the transformation"
> > For now, this string won't go to the UI, but it might happen in the
> > when gegl will be integrated, so I keep it marked for translation.
> Hi Michael,
> I strongly doubt it would make sense to bother our users with names of
> GObject classes, could you elaborate on why we should do this?
> Best regards,
> My GIMP Blog:
> "GIMP 2.8 schedule on tasktaste.com"
Gimp-developer mailing list