first I want to say that I have been on this list quite for a long time
now. And I am *really* impressed by the traffic on this list and by the
amount of work that has gone into the Gimp 1.2-development.
Gimp has become a great tool that I never would want to miss.
Marc Lehmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 01:18:54AM +0000, Nick Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From the user's perspective The Gimp is part of GNOME. For 1.2 this
> > won't be really true, but only because of lack of development time to
> > handle the changes.
> Maybe I am misinformed... I have a different impression, but since there is
> no central steering agency for gimp, we will never know ;)
Same impression here. I can't remember that I installed Gnome on
my desktop. And although I use Gimp for a long time now I never got
the impression that I was working with Gnome.
Of course I read on the Gnome-Office-site that Gimp would be part of
Gnome-Office. Well I was quite surprised to read that as I didn't
see any discussions about this topic here.
> > I suppose we might conclude that vendors will ship only KDE, in which
> I talked quite a bit about that with Kalle Dalheimer about "kimp". You
> (rightly) remember that the "official" plan is to seperate the gimp ui
> from the core.
> The KDE people would not at all be opposed to code their own gui.
This is still true. I can post to kde-devel and kde-core-devel
as soon as the ui and the core of gimp have been seperated.
I'm quite sure that many KDE-people would be interested in coding
a KDE-UI for The Gimp.
> The reason for their hack (no one says kgimp was a reasonable design) was
> that they lack the developer power to help with the core/ui seperation.
Well actually the reason for the hack was something else:
Matthias Ettrich wanted to show in one of his talks how easy it is
to port an application to KDE/Qt. To convince people he wanted
to show this by using a "real-life-example": an application everyone
knows about which isn't too easy to port either. Therefore he began
to port parts of The Gimp during the night before his talk took
> > case maybe those wacky Qt people will show up again and threaten to code
hmmm ... wacky ...?
> > a replacement Kim*g*sh*p if we won't re-write Gimp in C++ :)
I don't remember that we threatened anyone here.
Well people already work on kimageshop & imageforge. The development of
kimageshop has been hibernated for some weeks though because the
were working on KDE2-libs.
> We haven't ever seen a bad comment about kde here or on #gimp, for sure ;)
I can confirm this ;^)
> The problem with this is that many people on the kde lists are 3133t3-type
well ... no comment .... ;)
> people, unlike with gnome (simply because kde is the perceived leader,
> which is of course bound to change soon ;)
of cooourse ... everyone knows that ;)
> > UI in the 1.3.x devel series, so maybe then everyone will have a better
> > opportunity to evaluate the dependencies of Gimp.
> That would enable a _sensible_ kde frontend, and most probably a cool perl
> interface for web-servers and the like ;)
Im glad to hear that.
> Regardless of what happens, I do not feel like a gnome developer at all, I
> don't even use gnome (much because of the same reasons I do not use kde).
:-) I don't use KDE all the time either ...
> I am sure I am not the only one who feels more-or-less strongly that gimp
> != gnome.
> > But - back to 1.1.x coding!
Yes, back to coding -- but it's KDE 2.0 here instead...
Thanks for your wonderful work, Gimp-developers!
> Unfortunately, it's more like "1.2 fixing" :(
> -----==- |
> ----==-- _ |
> ---==---(_)__ __ ____ __ Marc Lehmann +--
> --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ / [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
> -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\ XX11-RIPE --+
> The choice of a GNU generation |