On Tue, 30 May 2000 20:04:02 +0200 (MEST), Jens Finke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

>I think c) is the best solution. It's surely quite hard to find _all_
>contributors to the code.

Actually, I think that the version that was initially put into CVS was 
pure S&P, so the CVS log should adequately document all contributors
since then.


Reply via email to