Austin Donnelly wrote:

> Something like (dx*dx + dy*dy) > thresh might be a better condition, no?

Yes ;)

Thank you.

No one particular value of  "Thresh" would please everybody, it would give
rise to a "snap to an invisible grid" effect, so a setting mechanism for
this value should extrude into preferences. Though for very precise positioning,
one can resort to the "Move Tool" and cursor keys, and, perhaps dispense with
a preference setting (for now) and retain a relatively large area threshold.

I haven't tried this to see if it improves the situation. A matter for this
coming weekend.

Be good, be well


Reply via email to