On Tue, Dec 26, 2000 at 04:03:42AM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >  Why not use CVS and tags? Makes life much easier for both sides. 
> 
> 
> Because
> a) my bandwidth is limited

You can use -z9 with cvs, which means the transfer size is not larger than
downloadign a normal diff.
> Therefore, downloading a 200k patch is a lot easier than getting a
> cvs-able gimp tree that I can update TODAY.

Why not generate a patch using rdiff -u or something like that?

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       [EMAIL PROTECTED] |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |

Reply via email to