the politeness of Japanese people is just a trick, isn't it ?
For the future I would recommend to totally ignore postings by timecop.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Disclaimer: This should really be addressed personally to egger, but after
> writing this I thought that I should post it for general consumption
> anyway. If you are easily offended, or if you think that SuSe "rulez", or
> if you think that you are a "31337 g1mp h4x0r" then you shouldn't read
> the rest of this message.
> On Tue, 26 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > You are such a whining moron. Why should I solve YOUR homemade
> > problems? Now go think again....
> Hey shithead, all I am asking for is a fucking patch for a piece of shit
> program that could have been replaced by photoshop 6 long fucking time
> ago. And I am not even asking you to do it, because obviously you are
> incapable of helping others. No go back to running your idiot friendly
> suse distribution and fuck off. I haven't installed gimp 1.2 and I don't
> plan to until you elitist bastard developers plan to provide me with a
> patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2.0. And if it doesn't happen then I guess fuck
> gimp. If you ignorant fuckheads want your shit to suceed you need to
> worry about USERS not what YOU want to do. My recent postings here about
> providing for a more consistent *USER* experience with gimp were met with
> fucking idiotic hostility of "31337 hax0rs g1mp 1z 31337 d0nt fux0r w1th
> 1t" type attitude, if you want your shit to be used by random web
> designers who don't know how to recompile their kernel and don't know what
> version of GTK they have installed on the system, you need to pay
> attention to shit like this. As long as you think that gimp is your fuck
> toy, that's going to stay exactly that way, and most people who know what
> they want will be using photoshop instead. So fuck off and die, and don't
> litter the mailing list with your retarded postings. *I* have a genuine
> user concern, that is having to download 10mb of source code instead of a
> patch, when nothing is stopping *the developers* from providing me with
> such things. If I was asking for gimp to be integrated into Office 2000,
> you might think I have a problem. But all I am asking is for something
> that you shitheads have done for the last year giving patches from
> previous version to the next, and how the fuck is this any different from
> providing a patch from 1.1.32 to 1.2.0. Like I said, fuck off and die.
> timecop at japan.co.jp | $B#O#ADL?.%5%S!<%93t<02q<R(B | NTT DoCoMo
> I thought everything that Linus Torvalds is involved with was divine
> perfection? Must be a problem with NEC and Sony -about Crusoe recall