On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Marco Ciampa wrote:
> I think that the gimp doc web page is a bit misleading.
> I think that the pages should be arranged in this way:
> ^^ ^^^^^
> language version
> code code
> and the always developing code trunk should be published in this way:
> In this way we could easily compare the different versions and make the
> online user always use the most updated version.
> So the "Work in progress" HTML link anchors should point in the latter
> form and not (as it is now) to a specific version (2.8).
> This is a kind of "RFC" :-) please say what you think about it.
PS: I've swapped language code and version code. The link should be read as:
| Linux User #78271 |
| FSFE fellow #364 |
gimp-docs-list mailing list