thanks frank. i'll do making the white parts a different color. Frank Gore-3 wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 1:16 AM, nnaemekadavid <odimegwuda...@yahoo.fr> > wrote: >> That is my editing so far an I got this image. Who can advise me on what >> step to carry out next. > > Not sure what you're trying to do exactly. What do you mean by > "saving" it? Was it originally a RAW file or a JPG from the camera? If > it was a JPG, then there is no headroom, no recoverable data for the > overexposed sections. They're blown, they're white, and there's > nothing you can do about that except to make the white parts a > different colour. All detail in those overexposed sections does not > exist, and therefore cannot be recovered. > > If this was a RAW file from the camera, then there may be _some_ > recoverable detail stored in the file. But that picture is so blown in > so many sections, I doubt any available headroom will be of much use. > You'll still end up with barely any detail in those white sections. > Again, the only thing you'll be able to do is make the white into a > different colour. > > If you're looking for artistic impression advice to learn how to make > the overexposed section look more appealing, that's purely a > subjective opinion. What you've done so far looks pretty good, in my > opinion. > > -- > Frank Gore > THE place to talk photography! > www.FriendlyPhotoZone.com > _______________________________________________ > gimp-user-list mailing list > gimp-user-list@gnome.org > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list > >
-- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/saving-an-overexposed-image-tp33955818p33962701.html Sent from the Gimp User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ gimp-user-list mailing list gimp-user-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list