Richard Gitschlag (strata_ran...@hotmail.com) wrote:
> > From: si...@budig.de
> > ...because mitch discovered a nasty bug with this and this has not been
> > fixed yet...
> ...like how layer groups don't have a fixed size and their
> width/height are automatically derived from the size/placement of
> their constituent layers?
No, it was a more subtle bug. Masking a layer group appeared to work
fine and I don't recall under which circumstances it failed.
gimp-user-list mailing list