On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Kasim Ahmic <kasim.ah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's basically just a content swap. It still needs to be entirely restyled.
> Also, I found something out. If I change one of the classes, the body
> becomes fluid. The problem with that is the images (the browser icons on the
> page) and the text end up too far apart on the body.
>
> This is the exact reason why I chose to go for a static design. The mockup
> that Mike made doesn't exactly work with a fluid design unfortunately.
> Unless we come up with something different, I'm afraid we'll be stuck with a
> static design.

There's a difference between the grid:
http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/scaffolding.html#gridSystem

and the fluid grid:
http://twitter.github.io/bootstrap/scaffolding.html#fluidGridSystem

I've only given the proposed layout a once-over, but I'm pretty sure
you want to use the default grid, not the fluid, for this layout.

Chris
_______________________________________________
gimp-user-list mailing list
gimp-user-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gimp-user-list

Reply via email to