On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Sam Gleske wrote:
> Isn't the purpose of GEGL integration attempting to pull as much of the
> graphical functions out of GIMP as possible so that GUI could be switched
> but the underlying library has the same quality of image manipulation?
> If that's not the case what is the point of GEGL?
Oh, I don't know...
32bit per color channel precision?
Graph-based non-destructive processing?
gimp-user-list mailing list